cross-posted from: https://lemmy.radio/post/3983333

Meshtastic – an open-source mesh networking platform redefining communication. From decentralized, long-range capabilities to versatile applications in emergency response, outdoor adventures. Discover the diverse hardware options, step-by-step setup guide, and the remarkable range of 5 KM - 10 KM.

  • sexy_peach@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    What exactly could I use this for? I know how LoRaWAN works, but it requires entrypoints into the internet. Does Meshtastic need these? Do I have to set up two nodes to use it for anything? Does it use existing LoRaWAN infrastructure?

    • N1ghtstalk3r@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      You wouldn’t need internet access for these to work, although there is a public community WAN server you could join to operate under MQTT (which is their internet facing WAN function). They function off of LoRa RF on the 915mhz band in the U.S. (and other bands elsewhere) to do the bulk of the communication. BLE is also utilized for management.

      These do need more than 1 node to operate properly, but since it works off the concept of a public mesh (with options to privatize), you don’t need two of your own devices in a developed location.

      However, if no one is around or within line of sight… then you’ll have to work a little harder to get contacts/connections going.

        • N1ghtstalk3r@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          For now, yes. There are certain extensions and 3rd party plugins that are seeking to expand on that by adding BBS capability or JS8call (for expanded text & basic audio).

          There’s limited bandwidth to work with on just the 915mhz band but you’d be surprised what you can push downstream.

          • sexy_peach@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            3 months ago

            I find it rather useless if it only supports text messaging. Why not use cb radio or whatever at that point? That seems more useful in a disaster situation.

            • N1ghtstalk3r@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              3 months ago

              Very low cost of entry ($30-40), mesh capability for redundancy, and its on fairly accessible public bands although it occupies a specific part of it. Also it comes with end to end encryption.

              It’s just a far more cost effective solution compared to having a CB radio, where you’d need to be licensed to have certain features or to communicate on VHF/UHF etc. You also wouldn’t need to learn any sort of HAM based etiquette to operate these devices.

              Although if you need the extra capability, like voice comms, and want the flexibility that comes with HAM you can also incorporate these into that system.

                • N1ghtstalk3r@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  3 months ago

                  If that’s the only gripe you have, then it just seems like you’re looking for reasons to not use this technology.

                  That’s okay, it’s not for everyone. If you prefer to use your HAM radio, by all means feel free to do so and occupy those frequencies.

                  Myself and others in the Meshtastic community will still welcome you with open arms, if and when you decide to check it out.