I can’t believe I’m arguing about whether there are people that should be killed or not. Of course not! Killing oil executives is not the only way to stop fossil fuel from being used. You’re a bad person if you’re seriously proposing this.
Shouldn’t be killed
Mass shootings are never a solution, also not in C-suites. I don’t think anyone should be ‘taken out’.
AI is not going to come op with a solution and he knows it.
Good for some use cases. Only if the Signal Foundation stays in the current track and it doesn’t go south like with Mozilla.
For a privacy chat group with random people, maybe another app would be a bit better.
Good correction, thanks
Right, then Signal might not be the best option. The NSA can easily track who’s using Signal, and possibly do some traffic correlation to reveal who’s talking to who.
But to state that there is no privacy on Signal at all is a bit of a stretch.
Depends, who do you want to shield what information from? Signal knows all of their users’ phone numbers. You can hide it from other Signal users. All depends on your threat model.
It’s a good thing that they’re not taking freedom of speech lightly, isn’t it? That can become unpleasant at times. This is difficult for an ISP that in principle wants to maintain net neutrality.
I’m sorry, but I don’t believe it is. Nearly all traffic is TLS. When this is attacked, you’d get TLS error. Am I missing something?
That must’ve been quite a while ago
I’m wondering how Apple will handle this in Safari.
Agreed, but I don’t understand the point of this image? Am I dumb?
It sorta protected Chrome’s monopoly in the browser world for years. Now that they’ve established that monopoly firmly, it’s time to crack down on things that diminish monetisation.
Should your disappointment here really be pointed at the journalists?
deleted by creator
What do you mean, they are helping? And how is it related to AI?