and basically no real use outside of generating misinformation and stealing from artists
This shows you think all AI are LLMs or generative art. Those are only the most visible faces of the tech, and you’re showing your name ignorance of the field.
I was pretty surprised by the barrenness of my wishlist. There’s been shockingly few titles I’ve been that excited about. Almost nothing in the AAA realm. And the few things that I am waiting to come out have been on that list for several years already…
Yeah what conditions are these scientists working under?
Imagine thinking normal people don’t have hobbies and then acting superior about it on the Internet…
Most AI are not built to answer questions. They’re designed to act as some kind of detection/filter heuristic to identify specific things about an input that leads to a desired output.
If you can still use it after you stole it, as opposed to not being able to use it at all… Then it does give you an incentive
It wouldn’t be. It would still work. It just wouldn’t be exclusively available to the group that created it-any competitive advantage is lost.
But all of this ignores the real issue - you’re not really punishing the use of unauthorized data. Those who owned that data are still harmed by this.
Making it open source doesn’t change how it works. It doesn’t need the data after it’s been trained. Most of these AIs are just figuring out patterns to look for in the new data it comes across.
I mean, terrorism is just politically motivated violence.
This country was founded by terrorists.
Yes, but this has to be done in a more local level. Trying to force a new party into existence starting at the federal level is not planning for success
No it’s not. They don’t fill the same story niche. And you’re human too, regardless of what your calls for calls for attention say.
I have a problem with dragons. They’re overused to the point of being boring
Our election system mathematically guarantees there will be only two useful choices. Any attempt to swap one of those out requires years of transition in which you are actively helping the side who agrees with you even less to win and move you further away from what you want.
Until we have more ubiquitous ranked-choice-esque systems, that will not change.
Did you chatgpt this title?
Mastodon is confusing as shit though. They could have made is not as confusing, but this is what happens when you get backend only developers designing the front end of a product.
Ugh, Google+ was so much better than Facebook. The whole circles concept was a game changer for social media that no one else has really adopted in a meaningful way. Half the reason millennials began to leave Facebook was not wanting their parents seeing what they’re posting, so being able to decide which group can see a particular post was an awesome idea.
Sadly it just never got the adoption
Being tangential to the overall topic doesn’t mean you’re addressing the actual main point of this thread
None of this line of questioning is related to this thread in a any way.
Yes.
We don’t need even more antivax idiots due to a complete lack of biology being taught in schools.
Sorry, but you’re just wrong. Every industry is not currently spinning up their own LLM. They ARE looking to incorporate AI into their work flows, causing huge demand for data centers.
This is Bloomberg, a business centered media site. They’re not dealing with what the plebs colloquially mean.