• benwubbleyou@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      It’s just like that old website, no nuance or discussion. It’s like r/atheism all over again.

  • MissJinx@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    Oh I’m totally Judging you too catholic. Any religious nuts btw

    You want to believe in something go ahead that’s healthy,

    You want to be part of a money making, rule setting, kid raping, woman killing (see how any religion applies?!) organization that tells you how and what you have to believe and that some people are less than others?! Then you are fucked up

    • Machinist@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      “see how any religion applies?!”

      Atheist of fundamentalist protestant extraction. Aren’t like some of the Buddhists pretty cool? Especially the Zen Buddhists. Also, Sikhs seem cool. And the Jainists.

      I could totally be wrong. Organized religion is a terrible thing in almost all of my experience.

      Wiccans have been real cool in my experience. They have really fun orgies.

      • catsarebadpeople@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        You’re right. It should say “most religions”. Jainists are the top example of a non harmful religion but very few Jainists exist. Sikhs do seem pretty cool but I haven’t done too much research on them. Buddhism is actually rife with violence and encourages masochism though the Zen sect is definitely better.

        I think the real point though is that saying, “I’m religious”, should be an embarrassing and negative statement. Not something that means the person should automatically be given the benefit of the doubt because a minority of religious people are just harmlessly misinformed. It’s like saying, “I’m a cannibal, but don’t worry, I’m part of a special Zen cannibal sect that only eats people after they die of natural causes and consented to being eaten because we think that it really helps the circle of life and the environment”. It’s not technically hurting anyone but it’s still weird and when you hear cannonball in general you should still automatically assume that person is dangerous.

        • androogee (they/she)@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          Different person sticking their nose in, but I really respect what the Satanic Temple is doing. Like in general, but also specifically their stance that religion should not be ceded as the territory of superstition.

          Like it or not, religion is one of the fundamental building blocks of community. It provides gathering. At its best it encourages sharing, both of burdens and of blessings. Prayer is so often just meditation focused on helping one another.

          I was raised in Christianity, and I am downright resentful of so much of what they did to me. But god I miss the community. Kink is the closest thing I have found in secularism.

          No Satanic Temple near me unfortunately. I’d love to have something like that in my life.

  • Hydra_Fk@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    If you had any sense you wouldn’t claim to be part of an organized religion that shielded people who raped kids. They shouldn’t shield people who are killing kids and committing genocide. These are pretty easy judgements for me and even Bob sees it.

        • benwubbleyou@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          So is arguing that because an organization has corruption and bad things happen in it that the whole thing is worth throwing away. If that was the case you would have to consider all governments, organizations, systems and businesses that are inherently faulty are worth the same dismantling.

          It’s almost as if all things made by human hands are faulty and can’t be repaired or something.

          • rockerface 🇺🇦@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 months ago

            Not all things, just organized religions. There’s a fine difference between “an organization has corruption and bad things happen” and “an organization has no point to exist other than to protect corruption and bad things within itself”. At least government gives me something when I pay taxes to it

          • Aurenkin@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 months ago

            Wow, what a fucking disingenuous argument. How disgusting do you have to be to wave away systemic child rape with “some corruption and bad things happen”?

            How about you examine why you think that dismantling an organisation that shields these people is a controversial idea? I don’t care if it’s a government, company, charity, any fucking place that is found to systemically protect child rapists needs to go, period. If you’re not comfortable with that idea, you should probably be asking yourself some questions.