• AA5B@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    2 days ago

    Wait, is this really true? I always assumed US was on the bad side of this trend

    • Delphia@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      Americas is low because they are cheap bastards, not out of any concern for food quality or animal welfare.

      • ArtieShaw@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        22
        ·
        3 days ago

        Ah - that was why I was so confused. Canada, for example, limits the growth hormone in dairy cattle while the US does not.

        • protist@mander.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 days ago

          Hormone-free milk is widely available in the US, it just costs a little more

          • evasive_chimpanzee@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            2 days ago

            Tbh, I don’t think I’ve ever seen hormone treated milk for sale in the US. They always say “not treated with rbst”, then have the disclaimer that rbst does not produce significantly different milk.

            I just assumed the hormone treated cow milk was used for making industrial foods like cheezit cheese or something.

      • protist@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        51
        ·
        edit-2
        3 days ago

        “Bang on in the middle” of the legend, but not of the data. And below the middle of the legend, actually. The bottom half of the legend covers 0 - 50 while the top half covers 50 - 200+. The US is at 31 mg/kg as of 2020

          • RogueBanana@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 day ago

            It’s pretty clear to me. 50 is there safe threshold as mentioned, everything below is safe, marked as blue and everything above is dangerous, marked as increasingly darker red. Looks quite nice and gets the point across imo.

          • protist@mander.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            17
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            3 days ago

            It’s impossible to use 0 unless you just want to let animals die from and spread infections. We live in a world in which bacteria and animals have been in an evolutionary arms race for a billion years

            • MrScottyTay@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              3 days ago

              I feel like we shouldn’t be eating meat if we have to jump through so much shit to “make it work”. Putting increasing your tolerance to antibiotics on the top of the cake and it’s a no go for health reasons alone.

              • protist@mander.xyz
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                9
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                3 days ago

                But we don’t have to jump through so much shit to make it work. We use science to treat or eliminate health issues in animals that existed well before modern medicine, or even before domestication. Be clear I’m not talking about the horrors of factory farming, but about veterinary medicine. People suffered before modern medicine too, but we’ve reduced mortality by a ton

              • cows_are_underrated@feddit.org
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                2 days ago

                There are differences with using antibiotics to make something work and to lower infection rates. China has 200+mg of Antibiotics usage. This is a clear case of using Antibiotics to make meat production possible, because theres no way you need this many antibiotics without some deep rooted problems. The US has A fraction of this. I don’t want to decline that, especially in bigger farms, antibiotics are used to make it work(at least partially), but I would guess that its often really just to treat sick animals.

          • ChicoSuave@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            3 days ago

            31mg is weak for a grown adult human. That means the average shows widespread low-level use OR high volumes for very low numbers, which is how it’s supposed to be when a patient has poor circulation from a lack of motion.

            • protist@mander.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              8
              ·
              edit-2
              3 days ago

              This is an average across the entire industry, not an indication of the dosage given to a single animal. Some animals will be on none, and others will be on a clinically appropriate dose as necessary

            • MrScottyTay@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              8
              ·
              3 days ago

              If you constantly eat meat with antibiotics in you’re increasing your tolerance to antibiotics no matter the amount. So when you actually need antibiotics they’re going to do fuck all for you

              • Phineaz@feddit.org
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                8
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                3 days ago

                A) “You” as in your mammalian cells don’t care about (most) antibiotics. Your intestinal microbiome does, however. But it doesn’t exactly get resistant. B) Antibiotica used in medicine are generally reserved for medical purposes. High usage in agriculture is not pretty, sure, and certainly won’t help multi-resistant pathogen issues, but your statement is wrong regardless.

      • testfactor@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        12
        ·
        3 days ago

        I mean, we’re doing better than basically every other 1st world country, and those that are beating us don’t have big livestock industries.

          • Soup@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            24
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            3 days ago

            The U.S. has to pretend that they don’t exist because it would cause them to face a lot of big issues otherwise.

        • argon@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          18
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          3 days ago

          we’re doing better than basically every other 1st world country

          You must have a very unusual definition of first world.

        • Skua@kbin.earth
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          3 days ago

          The UK and New Zealand are both big livestock producers which are doing well on this metric. But yes, the US is doing alright overall here

  • enkers@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    36
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    3 days ago

    Hope you had a great christmas

    My leek+mushroom stuffed seitan roast was delicious, antibiotic-free, and cruelty-free. So tyvm, I did.

    • Tangent5280@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      How did it taste? Do you have a recipe I can follow? I don’t know hoe far a vegan ingredients shopping run will go where I live though.

      • enkers@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        The gluten doesn’t have a very strong flavour on its own (it basically tastes like unflavoured bread) but it picks up whatever you season it with very well. The recipe I make goes for a typical poultry style seasoning with nooch and veggie broth. The stuffing is very umami with a little brightness from the lemon. It’s very yummy.

        Here’s the recipe I use for the roast:

        https://www.theppk.com/2011/11/seitan-roast-stuffed-with-shiitakes-and-leeks/

        And I make the gravy from this recipe:

        https://www.rabbitandwolves.com/vegan-crispy-black-pepper-cauliflower-steaks/

        (Which incidentally is also a very good vegan holiday recipe in its own right!)

        You might have trouble finding vital wheat gluten. I’d recommend checking either health food or bulk stores, or just buying it online. Everything else should be pretty easily accessible.

        While you can make the recipe with the wash-the-flour method from regular flour, it’s already a bit of a challenging recipe, and you have to tweak quite a few things to get the proper wet:dry ratio, so I wouldn’t recommend it, especially for your first try.

        I normally also do a side of mashed potatoes, and then some other veg like carrots+parsnips, or Brussels sprouts.

      • PagingDoctorLove@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 days ago

        If you get a lot of specialty items (like faux cheeses and meats) it won’t go far. If you shop like normal but just skip the animal products it’ll almost surely be cheaper than regular groceries. You can make your own seitan very easily, there are many YouTube videos showing you how. It’s just a simple dough that is washed and kneaded to develop the gluten. You can also make your own tofu, but tofu is dirt cheap unless you get fancy stuff so I recommend just buying it.

  • MrMobius @sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    39
    ·
    3 days ago

    I thought the US would be way up there given the intensive livestock industry there. But I guess we all underestimated the pig industry in China. They have multi-storey slaughter houses for pigs over there!

    • Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 days ago

      Really, why?

      Like why not process rural, it has to be cheaper to just use rural land and go horizontal than vertical.

      • Liz@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        2 days ago

        We used to do vertical in Chicago. You drive the livestock to the top floor, butcher them there, then use gravity to move them around.

  • blaue_Fledermaus@mstdn.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    37
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    Brazil certainly should be broken down by state, I imagine the USA as well.

    My state in south Brazil has VERY strict controls on animals entering the state so we can use less antibiotics and other stuff.

    • Kusimulkku@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 days ago

      Then you’d likely have to do that for every country with subdivisions that affect the chart

  • aquinteros@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    this should be adjusted for amount produced … in chile the antibiotic usage is high but we mostly consume meat from Argentina and Brasil

  • deegeese@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    3 days ago

    Are the nordics low because of cleaner feed operations, or are the nordics zero because it’s been banned?

    • Nikelui@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      43
      ·
      3 days ago

      In Scandinavia they have a policy to minimize the use of antibiotics, even on people, to prevent antibiotic resistance.

      • iri@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        19
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        3 days ago

        Which has two sides to it. It is very hard to get antibiotics unless there is a clear sign of a specific infection going on, e.g. after a tick bite those red circles on the skin.

        In any other case just having high fever for a bit does not prompt doctors to check for bacterial infections. Instead they ask you how long you got that fever and if you say anything lower than 6/7 days they simply tell you to come back after 6/7 days if the fever isn’t gone still. Only then they run a blood test and prescribe antibiotics, should you have a bacterial infection.

        I understand the idea but you could probably test much earlier and give the antibiotics, if useful, earlier so that people can avoid feeling miserable for just a few days instead of a whole week. It also just prompts people to lie about how long they’ve been sick, just in case.

          • lad@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 days ago

            My friends not in Scandinavia used to have slight fever for a couple of months before going to a doctor to find out it was pneumonia. I wonder, how Scandinavian doctors react to slight fever, not a bad fever, and if they send you back home then this an example of what’s wrong. Other than that it’s likely a good idea to try to make one’s body heal itself, if the immune system is not compromised

            • Kusimulkku@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              edit-2
              2 days ago

              I mean having a slight fever for a while is not something to be concerned about or honestly often not something to go to a doctor for, unless it lasts or worsens. Though if your friend waited a couple of months then your friend might be a bit stupid.

        • Nikelui@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          14
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 days ago

          Oh, yeah. Exaggerating your symptoms is the only way to make doctors take your condition seriously. Unless you are a pregnant woman, or a cancer patient. Nordic healthcare is sometimes frustrating in small ways.

    • ryedaft@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      Agriculture isn’t terribly industrialised in Sweden and Norway. So smaller farms means fewer animals get infected when something is going around. And fewer practises like weaning piglets early and giving them prophylactic antibiotics.

      And the projection makes them look big on the map.

  • obscur_e@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    3 days ago

    how much antibiotics should i take if i go to china? im around 70 kilos

  • shoulderoforion@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    3 days ago

    China builds workers, they really don’t care what happens to their people after prime working ages of 14 to 35, ergo they pump their livestock up with as many antibiotics as can produce the most protein, and leave any issues of antibiotic resistance to … later (never)

  • Guadin@k.fe.derate.me
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    3 days ago

    Thankfully I live in a country where they use it very sparse. Unfortunately, not alle the meat I consume is comming from my country…