• bdonvr@thelemmy.club
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    97
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    3 days ago

    In a land where desktops can be ripped out and replace with ease - what’s the point in arguing? GNOME isn’t my thing but I’m glad it’s an option.

          • Flipper@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            14
            ·
            3 days ago

            Depends on your login flow. There is a session manager which normally boots up and let’s you choose. But you can also configure it to auto login and send you to the Lockscreen of your window manager.

          • gimsy@feddit.it
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            edit-2
            3 days ago

            You can also mix login manager, window manager with desktop background managers, wallet managers etc…, in practice you can build your own desktop experience

            • SynopsisTantilize@lemm.ee
              cake
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              2 days ago

              I know the answer is “just build it” but man I want to be able to have adm<username login under something like nemo and a terminal window only. But then have username login under full Mint Cinnamon. Would be quite dope. Just don’t feel like making it happen at the moment. I’ll have to reconfigure permissions to revoke from my standard user.

              Edit: oops you can comment out text in Lemmy? Editedit: I did it. Too me 15 minutes -.-

          • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 days ago

            It will be goofy as the config files will still stick around between desktops.

            I would runs desktop in a container or VM.

    • jj4211@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      2 days ago

      Mainly because gnome is harder to ignore than a lot of other opinionated DEs.

      It’s been the default target for fedora and red hat, and like other choices rh makes, it propagates throughout the broader ecosystem.

      Even if you ignore them, they dictate how Linux desktops are broadly allowed to work by largely asserting authority over FreeDesktop and by extension Wayland.

      One of these is that they absolutely hate the concept of server side decorations, as a result even as they begrudgingly allowed it as a Wayland protocol, they insisted that it must not be mandatory and they are allowed to ignore it. This means applications that do not care about their decorations otherwise now must care about their decorations. As a user, the consequence is that any GTK application you might use is likely to just pop out as a gnome looking window among a bunch of otherwise consistent windows.

      • Semperverus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        I avoid all of the modern gnome apps now as a result of this.

        Even Windows allows the equivalent of server side decorations…

    • wer2@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      My main complaint with how Gnome does stuff is in environments where it is the only option (e.g. RHEL).

      • 3laws@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        3 days ago

        Which then is no longer an issue with GNOME but rather RHEL. But again, it’s not like we can’t figure out a way to install whatever in Hanna Montana’s dreams is allowed. 🤙