• kjetil@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    2 days ago

    Difference is timescale. Coal “sequestered carbon” over millions of years, and released over a few decades.

    Biomass gathers and realeases on the same timescale

    • Philippe23@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      Then you’re saying biomass is not really sequestering carbon, essentially.

      • bitwaba@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        Neither is solar or wind. But they’re all net-zero or near-zero carbon emissions when considering the entire lifestyle of the energy and machinery production.