JOMusic@lemmy.ml to Open Source@lemmy.mlEnglish · edit-211 hours agoSam Altman admits OpenAI has been on the wrong side of history with Open-Sourcelemmy.mlimagemessage-square43fedilinkarrow-up1240arrow-down14
arrow-up1236arrow-down1imageSam Altman admits OpenAI has been on the wrong side of history with Open-Sourcelemmy.mlJOMusic@lemmy.ml to Open Source@lemmy.mlEnglish · edit-211 hours agomessage-square43fedilink
minus-squaresuoko@feddit.itlinkfedilinkarrow-up9arrow-down1·9 hours agoWe have plenty of alternatives like Mistral, Gemini, qwen, deepseek… But none of them is fully open source that you know data they’ve been trained with, right? Maybe only K2 ?
minus-square/home/pineapplelover@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up3arrow-down1·9 hours agoI thought deepseek was open source. Guess not
minus-squareirelephant 🍭@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up5·2 hours agoJust the weights, training it is another story.
minus-squaresunzu2@thebrainbin.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down1·38 minutes agoBetter than others but not true “open source”
minus-squareNaevaTheRat [she/her]@vegantheoryclub.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up13arrow-down1·8 hours agoYou can download the model, you do not have the source of the model. It is similar to releasing a compiled software app as shareware vs publishing your source code.
We have plenty of alternatives like Mistral, Gemini, qwen, deepseek…
But none of them is fully open source that you know data they’ve been trained with, right? Maybe only K2 ?
I thought deepseek was open source. Guess not
Just the weights, training it is another story.
Better than others but not true “open source”
You can download the model, you do not have the source of the model.
It is similar to releasing a compiled software app as shareware vs publishing your source code.