BomberMan9865@sh.itjust.works to linuxmemes@lemmy.world · 13 days agoXenia doesn't like Systemddiscuss.tchncs.deimagemessage-square52fedilinkarrow-up1274arrow-down181
arrow-up1193arrow-down1imageXenia doesn't like Systemddiscuss.tchncs.deBomberMan9865@sh.itjust.works to linuxmemes@lemmy.world · 13 days agomessage-square52fedilink
minus-squareVivendi@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkarrow-up8·13 days agos6, dinit, openrc, BSD rc, are all alternative init systems with their own method of doing thing
minus-squarePossibly linux@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4arrow-down1·12 days agoAll of them are worse in my experience. In a embedded context I use busybox init and if I need something more I used systemd. Systemd actually has a fairly small footprint. A few years ago I ran it on a system with 32mb of ram.
minus-squarea Kendrick fan@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up2·12 days agoGuix_SD has its own init system, Gnu shepherd
s6, dinit, openrc, BSD rc, are all alternative init systems with their own method of doing thing
All of them are worse in my experience. In a embedded context I use busybox init and if I need something more I used systemd. Systemd actually has a fairly small footprint. A few years ago I ran it on a system with 32mb of ram.
Guix_SD has its own init system, Gnu shepherd