Google’s campaign against ad blockers across its services just got more aggressive. According to a report by PC World, the company has made some alterations to its extension support on Google Chrome.

Google Chrome recently changed its extension support from the Manifest V2 framework to the new Manifest V3 framework. The browser policy changes will impact one of the most popular adblockers (arguably), uBlock Origin.

The transition to the Manifest V3 framework means extensions like uBlock Origin can’t use remotely hosted code. According to Google, it “presents security risks by allowing unreviewed code to be executed in extensions.” The new policy changes will only allow an extension to execute JavaScript as part of its package.

Over 30 million Google Chrome users use uBlock Origin, but the tool will be automatically disabled soon via an update. Google will let users enable the feature via the settings for a limited period before it’s completely scrapped. From this point, users will be forced to switch to another browser or choose another ad blocker.

Archive link

        • lnxtx@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 months ago

          I will happily donate.
          If, of course, money won’t go to the CEO.

          • stoy@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            3 months ago

            A CEO is a needed possition, I know in the past the Brendan Eich was controversial in his political views, but Laura Chambers seems ok so far

            • BRINGit34@lemmygrad.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              3 months ago

              A CEO is a needed possition

              Ha! Good one…

              oh wait. You’re serious…

              How is a ceo needed? They do no work. Their entire job is to rake in cash from workers.

              All a ceo needs is a guillotine.

              • BearOfaTime@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                edit-2
                3 months ago

                Right.

                And a football team doesn’t need a quarterback.

                🤦🏼‍♂️

                Yes, many of them are assholes, doesn’t change the need for the leadership.

                • umbrella@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  3 months ago

                  ceos are not equivalent to quarterbacks.

                  the ceo is equivalent of the team owner. he makes the money and not much else.