• marcos@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      In that it ignored the previous half a century of (well tested) advances on the area and just made claims that were already known not to hold on the real world.

      • Cowbee [he/him]@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        Can you for one second elaborate on anything you’re saying? What did Marx ignore, and what doesn’t hold in the real world?

        • marcos@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          For example, the entire labor theory of value doesn’t hold up on the real world and Economics had already better explanations for the phenomenon it was trying to explain.