• JovialSodium@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    40
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    6 hours ago

    I feel like most everyone* who cares about distros likes Debian. It may not be the right distro for your use case, but you’re glad it’s around.

    * I’m sure even Debian has it’s haters. But I think it’s a minority.

    • TriflingToad@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 hours ago

      I don’t really like debian. I can respect it as a good distro that’s based and all, but It doesn’t fit my use case of ‘just works’ the same way my steamdeck does (in regards to gaming and Windows similarly). For that I’ve found Bazzite or Kubuntu for their usage of KDE. (also manjaro was buggy 🤷‍♀️)

      I still can’t decide if I want to use Arch based to be similar to my SteamDeck, or Ubuntu based because dealing with packages is confusing.

      However I have semi-given up on Linux for my desktop PC because Nvidia sucks and I’ll try again on my semi-anually “ooo let’s try Linux again!” after Microsoft makes another dumb change. I’m gonna stick with it one day lol

    • TimeSquirrel@kbin.melroy.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 hours ago

      I use it because it feels like the most Linux-ey of Linuxes (Linuxii??). I don’t know how else to describe it. It’s like, no bullshit, just Linux. Here’s the Lego pieces, go have fun.

      • qjkxbmwvz@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 hours ago

        As a long-time Debian user, I’d have to throw my vote behind Slackware for the title of most UNIX-y, which is I guess a bit different from most Linux-y.

        Debian got me through grad school, but Slack got me through undergrad on a hopelessly underpowered old ThinkPad — Volkerding is a legend, and Slack will always be dear to my heart.

        • TimeSquirrel@kbin.melroy.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          5 hours ago

          Never experienced Slackware so I can’t compare, sorry. When I got into Linux in like, 2002, I was using Mandrake before they died, and didn’t hear much of Slackware at the time.

          I had a friend that was a couple years older that was running it on a home web server though. Back when people ran home web servers. This dude would sit there and use the keyboard the entire time even in OSes like Windows, he memorized every goddamn shortcut and macro that exists. Had a dusty mouse next to his system almost never being used. Probably just to satisfy the BIOS self test.

    • corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      5 hours ago

      I feel like most everyone

      Beware the false consensus. Not all birds are seagulls, but get a plate of chips and that’s all you’ll see.

    • marcos@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      5 hours ago

      It peaked somewhere between 2000 and 7. Personally, I place it in XP, but opinions vary.

      • Rhaedas@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 hours ago

        98SE, XP, and 7 each were relatively solid for their time. They all had issues, but were far better at being an OS than what we have now or are trying to be sold to constantly upgrade to.

        • corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 hours ago

          React OS is awesome, and I need it to run stable on some metal.

          And also play WoW, because I don’t trust linux to run whatever copy-protection crap is on there and not brick my account through no fault of its own.

    • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      5 hours ago

      Has there ever been a good version of Windows? Old versions were functional but terribly insecure and newer versions are reasonably secure but cloud connected ad platforms.

      Windows 10 is probably the middle ground although the newer versions come with the same anti features Windows 11 has

      • BCsven@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 hours ago

        Good question. I will say W7 because W10 necessitated an SSD to stay performant, so bloat and bullshit got rolled into W10

  • corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 hours ago

    The meme equates ‘popular’ with ‘better’. There’s a very good reason we didn’t try to make an ubuntu back in 2002, and that reason - weak/bad validation of deployed package payload - is still true today.

    If you care about build/release, precise validation is important to you. It’s one of the holy trinity of build/release.