• Zombie@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    28 days ago

    Signal only delivers a promise that their E2EE will be enough to make the information govts get useless.

    Signal do more than just a promise. Their encryption techniques are available to see. You can confirm if it’s enough protection for you or not. Telegram are the ones making a promise. I’m not saying they’ve broken their promise (as evidenced by the arrest).

    But it is just a promise when Telegram still has the ability to see messages. Signal can’t see messages and therefore don’t have to rely on a promise that can be broken (willingly or not). They instead rely on encryption, which appears to be far stronger than any promise could be.

    For all we know, this is performative and the French government already has access to Telegram’s servers and can see everything. If they have access to Signal’s, oh well, they can’t see shit.

    • TCB13@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      28 days ago

      Telegram are the ones making a promise. I’m not saying they’ve broken their promise (as evidenced by the arrest).

      The fact that govts go after them kinda validates the promise. Unlike Signal.