I was quoting the article.
I was quoting the article.
“Use his influence” = get what he paid tens of millions in bribes for
We could breed monkeys to much higher populations.
The /s was delivered by the preference for newspapers. That was the giveaway in case you weren’t catching on earlier.
Also in the show.
Wow! It’s a schooner!
Can it tell if I fart in public? Asking for a friend.
Why you gotta do Fonzie like that?
What’s the overlap of cheaters and people who perform DDoS attacks?
Could be mRNA. Could be gRNA. But I think this article wants them in all caps.
CDNA is actually DNA made using RNA as a template. Very important for the viral ecosystem.
A ChatGPT reply is generally clear, concise, and informative. It aims to address your question or topic directly and provide relevant information. The responses are crafted to be engaging and helpful, tailored to the context of the conversation while maintaining a neutral and professional tone.
One argument in favor of bots on social media is their ability to automate routine tasks and provide instant responses. For example, bots can handle customer service inquiries, offer real-time updates, and manage repetitive interactions, which can enhance user experience and free up human moderators for more complex tasks. Additionally, they can help in disseminating important information quickly and efficiently, especially in emergency situations or for public awareness campaigns.
To subterranean levels.
You can have the next quip.
Brain cancer, no. Brain rot, yes.
What you wrote is essentially true of Li+ ion batteries (not truly green unless the electricity is too). The part I was missing was the efficiency of electrolysis being half that of Li+ charging.
Fuel cells can also run cars, and refilling is much faster than recharging. So you can build cars which can go long ranges with quick stops. But of course the infrastructure for hydrogen fuel is well behind even car chargers, let alone gasoline.
I’m not sure what you meant by your first sentence. There are words missing. But any energy conversion will have efficiency losses. That includes for lithium batteries too.
Hydrogen should be used for portable energy, like you said. Are electric cars also not considered green unless they are charged with non-fossil fuel sources? I think everyone understands that they enable us to use other energy sources but they don’t in and of themselves reduce dependence.
They don’t have borders, so eventually they will come to the US.