Basically a deer with a human face. Despite probably being some sort of magical nature spirit, his interests are primarily in technology and politics and science fiction.
Spent many years on Reddit and then some time on kbin.social.
That’s not how synthetic data generation generally works. It uses AI to process data sources, generating well-formed training data based on existing data that’s not so useful directly. Not to generate it entirely from its own imagination.
The comments assuming otherwise are ironic because it’s misinformation that people keep telling each other.
The “how will we know if it’s real” question has the same answer as it always has. Check if the source is reputable and find multiple reputable sources to see if they agree.
“Is there a photo of the thing” has never been a particularly great way of judging whether something is accurately described in the news. This is just people finding out something they should have already known.
If the concern is over the verifiability of the photos themselves, there are technical solutions that can be used for that problem.
Eh, not necessarily. Hollywood hates piracy and Trump hates Hollywood, it might actually be as simple as that.
Europe has freight trains too.
I don’t see why this is a point worth quibbling about. The “gag” is that rails are designed for self-driving vehicles, but most trains are not self-driving. It’s only relatively recently that any of them are.
Most trains aren’t public transit, either. They’re freight haulers.
That’s not most trains. Those are highly specialized and constrained applications. There are already self-driving taxis in certain defined city areas, so they’re still ahead by that standard.
Canada’s closed, sorry.
Trains don’t self-drive, though.
Edit: Okay, for the pedants: most trains don’t self-drive.
Not necessarily. If they’re low on cash then cutting unnecessary costs is not unreasonable. What is Mozilla’s core goal? Perhaps the “advocacy” and “global programs” divisions weren’t all that relevant to it, and so their funding is better put elsewhere.
Entertainment.
If you think it’s supposed to be predictive you’re perhaps confusing it with futureology, which is a more scientific field.
Fearing AI because of what you saw in “The Terminator” is like fearing sleeping pills because of what you saw in “Nightmare on Elm Street.”
There are people who want AI, crypto, and IoT things. If there weren’t then there’d be no money to be made in selling it.
AI models don’t actually contain the text they were trained on, except in very rare circumstances when they’ve been overfit on a particular text (this is considered an error in training and much work has been put into coming up with ways to prevent it. It usually happens when a great many identical copies of the same data appears in the training set). An AI model is far too small for it, there’s no way that data can be compressed that much.
In my experience the vast majority of posts about Elon Musk are from people who hate him and are tired of hearing about him.
There is a certain amount of irony when people respond to a comment that mentions AI with a reflexive “AI is just a fancy autocomplete!” Without any relevance to the larger context.
Yeah. A lot of people loudly declaring that they’re switching to Linux, followed by them staying with Windows anyway.
But it’s yet another opportunity to post a comment about how much we hate cybertrucks and the people who own them, so up it goes!
Yeah, the whole concept of “national” TLDs is proving to be a rather poor one in practice. Very few of them actually make sense in the way they’re used.
Heh. I fell off of contributing in recent years, but there was a time back in the day when my edit count was in the top hundred or so. Your impression is completely wrong.
Anyway, this discussion here isn’t going to affect what the people on Wikipedia are doing, so it doesn’t really matter. I linked to the project page above and it’s quite clear that even this “AI Cleanup” project is not in any way fundamentally opposed to using AI, they’re just focused on ensuring that editors using it are adhering to Wikipedia’s guidelines. If you think AI can’t do that then clearly your concept of how AI is useful is too limited.
He was just doing exactly that.