Looking through the first one’s content and it seems reasonable? The patent’s abstract is supposed to be as widely applicable as legally permitted, so it’s like a completely different language on top of legalese.
PKD has a novel in the same vein: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Indefatigable_Frog
Happy [object Object] birthday!
In theory, methods like nightshades are supposed to poison the work such that AI systems trained on them will have their performance degraded significantly.
A rare shot showing sandworms forming a pattern known as OwO.
Spell out numbers under 10, but not when it’s divisible by three or five.
This is a triumph. I’m making a note here, “HUGE SUCCESS”.
Did they test it on alligators or really hungry alligators?
Haha, but it’s really a pack of tools, more like a toolbox.
Now don’t look at the lamp next to your sofa too closely.
And that’s why you don’t see cooking mouse no more.
// TODO: Leave the code cleaner than you found
The true fediverse: in JPEG we trust.
…or does it?
Bingo!
The paper only says it’s a collaboration. It’s pretty large scale, so the opportunity might be rare. There’s a chance that (the same or other) researchers will follow up and experiment in more schools.
For true immutability, burn something like tails on a read-only CD.
u/Dangerous-Pizza7054 from the article,
Seems like the user tracking “special promotion” overrides the premium. They don’t even say whether it’s expected or not. But my take away is that paying for premium may or may not show you ads, but you are definitely tracked and harvested for data. (Maybe even more so, since, well, you are more valuable to them.)