Auto-updates are a hell-no for me.
There was a perfectly good user interface for updates. Then Ubuntu decides “wait… What if we made updates compulsory and effectively random and skipped the UI. The user can do system updates whenever they want, because those don’t matter for security or something, but these apps must be updated whenever snap determines they must.”
Oh, snap!
Glad to see someone was looking for a bumb fuck and got one. Life is good, sometimes.
Thanks for your explanation, here’s a fish:
🐟
Traceback (most recent post last):
The_Picard_Maneuver in memes
I don't get this post <image>
Hjalmanger
I don't get this post
Ifera
Dumb fuck! (I also don't get it)
CaptainBlagbird
Dumb fuck! (Dumb fuck!) ((I also don't get it))
Viking_Hippie
Error! Recursion loop! Danger, Will Fuckheadson! <image>
DumbFuckError while processing 'Error! Recursion loop!' <image>:
DumbFuckError("Got 'Error! Recursion loop!'(Dumb fuck! (Dumb fuck!) ((I also don't get it))), but i don't get it.")
Late stage capitalism.
The issue is that capitalism fundamentally requires forward thinkers and enlightened (or at least rational) perspective to function sustainably.
But capitalism rewards short term thinking, everywhere from corporate leadership, to the workforce, to the consumers caught by ads designed to catch and hold their ever-shortening attention spans.
Fundamentally, it needs regulation to thrive. The true cost of a purchase, including environmental and decommissioning/disposal costs must be tied to the initial purchase value. Through this, we might get a functional capitalism.
Mawwage… Is why… We aw gavowed… heea… Twwoday.
Good point.
Ooh, typo. I’ll edit it so that those who fulfill these kinds of things know not to glass your home.
Trilium. You’ll be glass glad you tried it.
And of actual wizards, thank you very much. And none of this is accidental - effeminate punk nerds are good company, and people who look like wizards… …help prevent assassinations.
Syncthing-fork on fdroid.
Womp womp
You’ve been savagely attacked by an internet monster.
What was that old adage: “i may not hold the opinion you do, but I will defend your right to hold that opinion.”
I suppose my view on it is similar:
If you believe that a psychological stance should be punished physically, it might behoove you to realize that you are only permitted to hold that opinion by the good graces of those who, rightly, stand ready to destroy you if you try to enforce that view physically.
True, but your post did kinda read like this: