I sure hope so. Pretty hard to sell cars if you don’t even know where they are
I sure hope so. Pretty hard to sell cars if you don’t even know where they are
“God did it to trick you” is pretty hard to disprove
There’s bread from 14,000 years ago
I use it as a working Google and to make goofy pictures of ideas I have/tattoos I want
Isn’t most of Linux open source?
Plus that whole thing where record companies got caught price-fixing CDs. And the other thing where they got caught installing rootkits from CDs
Legally, yes. In practical terms, spending $1000 to fight a lawsuit and win $50 isn’t realistic, and I’d be willing to bet T-Mobile forces arbitration anyway
Confirmation bias bias
You don’t hear about it because the two major parties both oppose them and have nothing to argue about
Step 1: Add milk
I’m going wait for the follow up: showing how CEOs don’t prioritize human welfare over profits
Just gonna throw this idea out there:
What if they hired a bunch of engineers who graduated from sketchy, unaccredited colleges in foreign countries and paid them half as much much?
I mean, it’ll definitely take your mind of your lesser problems
Grass and gas also accepted
“Not blowing up later” would be part of the problem being solved
Engineering for future requirements almost always turn out to be a net loss. You don’t build a distillation column to process 8000T of benzene if you only need to process 40T
“Unregulated capitalism” sounds like the Soviet Union to you?
I didn’t answer your question because I don’t give a fuck about you, and also I wasn’t the person you responded to. Your lack attention to detail explains why you’re so confused
Sounds like a problem for later
Flippancy aside: the fundamental rule in all engineering is solving the problem you have, not the problem you might have later
No, this is Patrick
¿BEES?
Pretty easily: that’s the whole point of the concept of “reputation”