\documentclass[unholyhyphen]{donutreceipt}

Yeah, but they do it correctly.

This explanation sounds very reasonable, and it makes me feel even more disgusted.

What the actual f-

uck is up with th-

e hyphenation?

Definitely better than nothing, I just think researchers should more liberally give credit where it’s due, and although things are changing, I still see lots of people treat authorship like it’s some precious commodity.

Senior professor: Your work was instrumental in getting this published, and we think your efforts should be rewarded.

The reward: 👍

This guy peer-reviews.

Ortographobia.

systemd is a great operating system, it just lacks a decent text editor.

Don’t pull it too far, though, or else it’ll flip on its back and go nowhere.

That’s hilarious. I just love how AI is basically like a 6-year-old who weaves his favorite new expressions into everything without fully understanding what they mean.

If you’re having proportion of explained variance problems I feel bad for you son,
I got ninety nine problems but a fit ain’t one.

(⌐■_■)

I think there’s still a difference between describing a concept in a way laypeople would understand and describing it using plain English. The latter is what I consider good scientific writing.

Is it really science, if it doesn’t sound like something Neil deGrasse Tyson would say to himself for 30 minutes straight in front of his bathroom mirror?

I think you’re asking for a kind of nuance that most Info Warriors are unable to provide.

Up next on Info Wars: “They’re turning the mosquitoes gay!”

They should just run with it and branch out into other types of bewildered animal pastries.

I’ve never had Mountain Dew, but I always imagined it would taste like shower gel or shampoo. The scents/flavors even have similar names.

Yellow = weak bladder

The logo in the bottom right is from a German satirical TV show, so “fake” is a good bet (dunno though, haven’t seen it).