• Uruanna@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    It’s weird how your first thought is “the PhD is wrong” and not “I must have misunderstood something” .

    • ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      “I must have misunderstood something” .

      There was a reason I made that comment

      Though I disagree with the conservative genitalia = gender ideology

        • ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          24 hours ago

          Or the thought the phd must have meant something else

          But sure the phd is wrong if he meant that; just like those anti-vax doctors and anti-abortion doctors

          • Uruanna@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            4 hours ago

            It’s crazy how you’re still insisting that “the PhD is wrong if he meant that”’ rather than figure out that no, what you think they meant is not what they meant, it is not what they said, you are the one misunderstanding what they said. It has to be the PhD’s fault, certainly not yours.

            • ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              3 hours ago

              It’s crazy that you think me saying “if they meant that they are wrong” means I am not open for further clarification

              • Uruanna@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                2 hours ago

                And yet, when someone explained to you what the PhD said and meant, your response was:

                So not what the phd claims

                And just now you were still comparing them to anti-vaxx doctors “if they meant that”, when they clearly didn’t mean that, and you were already told what they meant. You’re still pretending that maybe they said something wrong. They didn’t.

                • ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 hour ago

                  they clearly didn’t mean that, and you were already told what they meant.

                  Which one is it? Is it they clearly didn’t mean what that person said or is it they meant what that person said

                  • Uruanna@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    ·
                    58 minutes ago

                    Or the thought the phd must have meant something else

                    But sure the phd is wrong if he meant that; just like those anti-vax doctors and anti-abortion doctors

                    The PhD is not wrong. The PhD meant what they said, but it is not what you think they meant or said. The mistake is yours, and you still insist that maybe it’s the PhD who’s wrong and meant something else they didn’t say - even after somebody else correctly explained what the PhD said and meant, to which you wrongly responded “that’s not what the PhD claims.”