Maybe enjoy crispy 128 .opus? Yeah flacs are on another level… But 100MB/file just doesn’t justify the negligeable quality increase you won’t even notice anymore in your late 40s !
That’s great for you but I fucked up my hearing by listening to Linking Park on maximum volume in the cheapest Chinese earbuds a third world teenager’s allowance could buy circa 2006.
… And getting stuff from YouTube takes 3% less effort.
Why would I want shitty mp3s when I can get crispy flacs just as easily? Fkn lol
Maybe enjoy crispy 128 .opus? Yeah flacs are on another level… But 100MB/file just doesn’t justify the negligeable quality increase you won’t even notice anymore in your late 40s !
However, saving TB of disk space does !
What are you downloading that’s 100MB?
Maybe a WAV.
Naah ! Most flac I have are in the 50/80 range but when you have a huge library it doesn’t make sense to archive in flac IMO.
It makes sense if you are music producer, but my whole library would need a huge SSD cluster :/
There is a solution to this, get a real flac and convert it to opus 🙂
Yeaaah ! That’s even better ! However, I’m listening to some obscure Electronic music which often doesn’t come in flac format :(
Oof, sorry that’s the case. I wish more artists would encode to a lossless format.
That’s great for you but I fucked up my hearing by listening to Linking Park on maximum volume in the cheapest Chinese earbuds a third world teenager’s allowance could buy circa 2006.
… And getting stuff from YouTube takes 3% less effort.
WHAT?!
Well technically from youtube at least they’re either oggs or m4as. However, yeah, flacs are better if you can get real ones.
show me anywhere other than youtube that has the demon cleaner cover by tool
point is that it is good for the random one-offs but agreed on how much easier it is to get flac over mp3, seems like most stuff i cant even find mp3