• trashgirlfriend@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    4 days ago

    Legit, what do you want my response to be to that.

    My whole argument was that internet people think shit posting is something profound but it’s just shitposting.

    Maybe I should have posted a crying wojak saying it so it’s Real Shitpost™ Art certified.

    • thebestaquaman@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 days ago

      To be fair, I didn’t expect you to respond at all, and really just wanted to point out that calling a stranger you know nothing about a “dweeb” in response to something they wrote is a prime example of “just being a cunt to someone”. You didn’t need to respond, but you chose to do so by being a cunt.

      Regardless, I think you missed some of the sarcasm in what I was writing (which, in hindsight, isn’t very clear). My point isn’t that shitposting is some form of high art. It’s that it’s a form of humor that amounts to more than saying provocative stuff or being a cunt. At it’s best, a shitpost can even contain some social commentary in the same way as caricatures can. Of course, as with all other humor, there are plenty of bad shitposts out there too, which are often just trolls trying to stir up shit.