• PugJesus@lemmy.worldOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    3 months ago

    It’s actually much less conservative than the surrounding areas. Though admittedly it only takes a stone’s throw to get into some pretty gruesome backwoods. The real issue is that there aren’t any jobs in the area. It’s too out of the way for tourism, all the factories have closed down, and the railroad just isn’t what it used to be.

    • 𝔼𝕩𝕦𝕤𝕚𝕒@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      So functionally they hand you money, you can’t find a job that pays your bills, so you leave and they’ve gained nothing. Or is the subsidy ongoing as long as they’re short on people (haha until the end of time!) Or is there something else in place to help keep people there?

      • MajorHavoc@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        Yeah. Seems pointless, but I bet they’re trying to attract folks with work-from-home jobs.

        There’s a big migration of work-from-home folks out to areas where they can have bigger homes, gardens and such.

        I think the theory is that whichever towns or cities attract these folks first will grow into long term preferred work-from-home destinations, using the tax revenue and voting habits of the first folks to move in.

        It’s a gamble, but an interesting one.

        • 𝔼𝕩𝕦𝕤𝕚𝕒@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          For WFH crows the town needs fiber, and in another post he stated the town doesn’t have that.

          I can see your point and that’s what I figured they were trying to attract

        • AA5B@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          Start with bringing in the fiber. I can deal without overnight delivery, a good sushi place or a brewpub, but I draw the line at fiber